Citations (20%)
4: ADVANCED. These annotated bibliographies include X* citations that demonstrate a mastery of the MLA format. There are few if any errors or omissions in punctuation, spelling, indenting, alphabetic order of citations, order of information within the citations, etc. Little to no available citation information is excluded (website title or organization for example).
3: PROFICIENT. These annotated bibiliographies include X* citations that demonstrate a proficient understanding of the MLA format. There may be a few, unobtrusive errors or omissions (see: 4). Little or no available citation information is excluded (see: 4).
2: DEVELOPING These annotated bibliographies include X* citations that demonstrate a limited grasp of the MLA format. There are several persistent errors and/or omissions in MLA format (see: 4). Some available citation information might be omitted repeatedly.
1: WARNING The annotated bibliographies include X* or more citations that demonstrate little understanding of MLA format. The citations contain some citation information but ignore the MLA rules.
(* The number of citations required is stated in the directions of the particular assignment. Some students reading longer texts could opt to do one citation for the text but then annotate each section of the reading separately. Also, x-1 citations at level 4 quality could yield a 3. The same number at level 3 quality could yield a 2. x-2 citations at level 4 quality could yield a 2. Etc.)
Annotations (80%)
4
These annotated bibliographies include X* annotations. The annotations present informative summation and insightful critique of the sources, including several annotations that are exceptionally informative and insightful. The annotations demonstrate clear relevance to the topic as stated in the title. (Sometimes the annotations are original, surprising, or inventive in the relevance they exhibit.) These annotations also offer summation and evaluation of a diverse range of perspectives and kinds of information on the topic. The writing is formal, authoritative, and exhibits few errors in standard American English conventions.
3
These annotated bibliographies include X* annotations. The annotations present informative summation and reasonable critique of the sources. The summation may not be as comprehensive and the critiques may not be as thorough or convincing as the annotations that receive 4s. The annotations demonstrate clear relevance to the topic. These annotations are consistently informative and critical. They offer some diversity of perspective and information on the topic as stated in the title. The writing is clear but may occasionally be informal, use first person, or contain errors in standard American English conventions.
2
These annotated bibliographies include X* annotations that attempt summary and critique of the sources. These annotations tend to summarize the kind of information in the source rather than the information itself. The critiques tend to be more superficial and less convincing than the annotations that receive 4s and 3s. (Sometimes these annotations provide information without discussing the source.) The sources may also be repetitive or lack diversity. The annotations may be tend to be too short, written informally, use first person excessively, or contain significant errors in standard American English conventions.
1
These annotated bibliographies include X* annotations that demonstrate little to no summation and critique. In other words little to no understanding of the task as stated in the directions. The annotations tend to be too short and may be written informally, use first personal excessively, and/or contain persistent errors in standard American English conventions.
*
(* The number of annotations required is stated in the directions of the particular assignment. Some students reading longer texts could opt to do one citation for the text but then annotate each section of the reading separately. Also, x-1 annotations at level 4 quality could yield a 3. The same number at level 3 quality could yield a 2. x-2 annotations at level 4 quality could yield a 2. Etc.)
4: ADVANCED. These annotated bibliographies include X* citations that demonstrate a mastery of the MLA format. There are few if any errors or omissions in punctuation, spelling, indenting, alphabetic order of citations, order of information within the citations, etc. Little to no available citation information is excluded (website title or organization for example).
3: PROFICIENT. These annotated bibiliographies include X* citations that demonstrate a proficient understanding of the MLA format. There may be a few, unobtrusive errors or omissions (see: 4). Little or no available citation information is excluded (see: 4).
2: DEVELOPING These annotated bibliographies include X* citations that demonstrate a limited grasp of the MLA format. There are several persistent errors and/or omissions in MLA format (see: 4). Some available citation information might be omitted repeatedly.
1: WARNING The annotated bibliographies include X* or more citations that demonstrate little understanding of MLA format. The citations contain some citation information but ignore the MLA rules.
(* The number of citations required is stated in the directions of the particular assignment. Some students reading longer texts could opt to do one citation for the text but then annotate each section of the reading separately. Also, x-1 citations at level 4 quality could yield a 3. The same number at level 3 quality could yield a 2. x-2 citations at level 4 quality could yield a 2. Etc.)
Annotations (80%)
4
These annotated bibliographies include X* annotations. The annotations present informative summation and insightful critique of the sources, including several annotations that are exceptionally informative and insightful. The annotations demonstrate clear relevance to the topic as stated in the title. (Sometimes the annotations are original, surprising, or inventive in the relevance they exhibit.) These annotations also offer summation and evaluation of a diverse range of perspectives and kinds of information on the topic. The writing is formal, authoritative, and exhibits few errors in standard American English conventions.
3
These annotated bibliographies include X* annotations. The annotations present informative summation and reasonable critique of the sources. The summation may not be as comprehensive and the critiques may not be as thorough or convincing as the annotations that receive 4s. The annotations demonstrate clear relevance to the topic. These annotations are consistently informative and critical. They offer some diversity of perspective and information on the topic as stated in the title. The writing is clear but may occasionally be informal, use first person, or contain errors in standard American English conventions.
2
These annotated bibliographies include X* annotations that attempt summary and critique of the sources. These annotations tend to summarize the kind of information in the source rather than the information itself. The critiques tend to be more superficial and less convincing than the annotations that receive 4s and 3s. (Sometimes these annotations provide information without discussing the source.) The sources may also be repetitive or lack diversity. The annotations may be tend to be too short, written informally, use first person excessively, or contain significant errors in standard American English conventions.
1
These annotated bibliographies include X* annotations that demonstrate little to no summation and critique. In other words little to no understanding of the task as stated in the directions. The annotations tend to be too short and may be written informally, use first personal excessively, and/or contain persistent errors in standard American English conventions.
*
(* The number of annotations required is stated in the directions of the particular assignment. Some students reading longer texts could opt to do one citation for the text but then annotate each section of the reading separately. Also, x-1 annotations at level 4 quality could yield a 3. The same number at level 3 quality could yield a 2. x-2 annotations at level 4 quality could yield a 2. Etc.)
No comments:
Post a Comment