Pages

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Hamlet Soliloquy 1.2: Analysis and Evaluation



Re-read Hamlet’s first soliloquy and answer the questions that follow.

SOLILOQUY
O, that this too too solid flesh would melt (1.2.131-61).

O, that this too too solid flesh would melt
Thaw and resolve itself into a dew!
Or that the Everlasting had not fix'd
His canon 'gainst self-slaughter! O God! God!
How weary, stale, flat and unprofitable, (135)
Seem to me all the uses of this world!
Fie on't! ah fie! 'tis an unweeded garden,
That grows to seed; things rank and gross in nature
Possess it merely
. That it should come to this!
But two months dead: nay, not so much, not two: (140)
So excellent a king; that was, to this,
Hyperion to a satyr; so loving to my mother
That he might not beteem the winds of heaven
Visit her face too roughly. Heaven and earth!
Must I remember? why, she would hang on him, (145)
As if increase of appetite had grown
By what it fed on: and yet, within a month --
Let me not think on't -- Frailty, thy name is woman! --
A little month, or ere those shoes were old
With which she follow'd my poor father's body, (150)
Like Niobe, all tears: -- why she, even she --
O, God! a beast, that wants discourse of reason,
Would have mourn'd longer--married with my uncle,
My father's brother, but no more like my father
Than I to Hercules: within a month: (155)
Ere yet the salt of most unrighteous tears
Had left the flushing in her galled eyes,
She married. O, most wicked speed, to post
With such dexterity to incestuous sheets!
It is not nor it cannot come to good: (160)
But break, my heart; for I must hold my tongue.

NOTES
too too ] The duplication of "too" intensifies Hamlet's feelings of regret. Repetition of this kind was a popular literary device in the Renaissance.
solid ] Many scholars ask whether Shakespeare intended "solid" to be actually "sallied", a form of the word "sullied". The second quarto of Hamlet contains "sallied", but the First Folio prints it as "solid". Modern editors have been quite divided on the issue. Editors of The Arden Shakespeare have chosen to use "sullied", while editors of The New Cambridge Shakespeare have decided upon "solid". The reasoning for the use of "solid" is fairly evident, as it logically corresponds to "would melt" (131). However, there are good arguments to support the claim that Shakespeare did mean "sullied". With "sullied" we have the "suggestion of contamination" (Jenkins 437), which is apparent throughout the soliloquy. Some critics stress "sullied" as the "contrast to 'self-slaughter' the resolving of the baser element into the higher, whereby Hamlet might return from melancholy to normal health, or, if to become dew is to die, then from 'misery' to 'felicity'. But there is surely no thought here of being restored to health or happiness, only of being free of the 'flesh' whether through its own deliquescence or through suicide." (Jenkns 187).
canon ] divine law; the Church regards "suicide" or "self-slaughter" forbidden by the Sixth Commandment, "Thou shalt not kill".
flat ] Spiritless.
unweeded garden ] A well-tended garden was symbolic of harmony and normalcy.
in nature/Possess it merely ] Although Hamlet accepts weeds as a natural part of the garden (and more generally a natural part of life), he feels that the weeds have grown out of control and now possess nature entirely (merely = entirely).
Hyperion ] {hy-peer'-ee-uhn} One of the Titans and the father of Helios, the sun-god.
Satyr ] {say'-tur} A grotesque creature, half-man and half-goat, symbolic of sexual promiscuity. Hamlet's reference to his dead father as Hyperion and to his uncle Claudius as a satyr illustrates Hamlet's contempt for Claudius. His father is godlike while his uncle is bestial.
beteem ] Permit. In anguish, Hamlet remembers the way his father would treat Gertrude with such gentleness and care. His father would not permit the wind to "visit her face too roughly".
ere ] Before.
Niobe ] {ny'-oh-bee} Symbolic of a mother's grief. Niobe, Queen of Thebes, boasted that her fourteen children were more lovely than Diana and Apollo, the children of Latona (Leto). Because of her arrogance, Niobe's children were slain by Latona's children, and Zeus turned Niobe to stone - yet still her tears flowed from the rock.
a beast, that wants discourse of reason ] Hamlet believes that even a creature incapable of speech would have mourned longer than Gertrude mourned for Hamlet's father (here wants=lacks). "The faculty of reason was traditionally recognized as the crucial difference between man and the beasts. This lends further significance to the Hyperion-Satyr comparison above. It was through his reason that man could perceive the relation of cause and effect and thus connect past with future, whereas the beast, precisely because it lacks reason, must live largely in the present moment. Hence the axiom that its mourning would be brief." (Jenkins 438).
Hercules ] {hur'-kyoo-leez} A Greek hero renowned for his super-human tasks. Having a father so strong and noble intensifies Hamlet’s feelings of inadequacy.
unrighteous tears ] See commentary below.
flushing ] Flushing refers to the redness in Gertrude's eyes from crying. She did not wait until the redness disappeared from her eyes before she married Claudius.
galled eyes ] Irritated and inflamed eyes.
dexterity ] One could take "dexterity" in this context to mean either speed or nimbleness.
incestuous ] Even though Claudius and Gertrude are related only through marriage, the union between a woman and her husband's brother, even if the brother was deceased, was considered incest (see Leviticus 16:20), and was explicitly forbidden by the Catholic and Anglican religions.
But break, my heart ] Hamlet's heart is heavy because he must keep his anguish to himself. "The heart was thought to be kept in place by ligaments or tendons (the heart-strings) which might snap under the pressure of great emotion" (Edwards 91).

RESPONDING TO SHAKESPEARE’S/HAMLET’S RHETORIC
1.        Word choice in context. If you were hired as the editor of a new edition of Hamlet would you choose “solid” or “sullied”? Write a focused paragraph defending your answer.
2.        Analyzing Imagery. Write a paragraph answering the following questions. How does the imagery in the soliloquy convey Hamlet’s attitude toward the world? Don’t just answer the questions create a cohesive paragraph (or paragraphs).
3.        Analysis and Evaluation. Write a paragraph (or paragraphs) answering the following questions. What is Hamlet’s attitude toward his own life? Why does he feel this way? Cite and explain textual evidence to support your answers. Also, given his circumstances is his attitude justified? Why or why not? If not what do you think his attitude should be? Dig below the surface. Have empathy. Put yourself in his shoes. Don’t just answer the questions address them in a cohesive paragraph (or paragraphs).
4.        Analysis and Evaluation. How does Hamlet feel about his mother? Why? In your paragraph, cite and explain at least two quotations from the speech to support your answer. Also, given what you know from the play is his attitude justified? Why or why not? If not what do you think his attitude should be? Dig below the surface. Have empathy. Put yourself in his shoes. Don’t just answer the questions address them in a cohesive paragraph (or paragraphs).
5.        Analysis and Evaluation. In a paragraph write about Hamlet’s attitudes towards his father and Claudius. In the paragraph you should explain the two contrasts Hamlet uses to show that his father (King Hamlet) is superior to King Claudius. (The notes will help you with these contrasts. Hint: Allusions help to reveal Hamlet’s attitude.) Also, given what you know from the play is his attitude justified? Why or why not? If not what do you think his attitude should be? Dig below the surface. Have empathy. Put yourself in his shoes. Don’t just answer the questions address them in a cohesive paragraph (or paragraphs).

Respond in the comment box. Use your first name and last initial. Number your answers appropriately. You may need to break your response into two or more comment posts.

Hamlet Soliloquy 1.2: Branagh, Gibson, Hawke, Tennant, Olivier

Click on this link for the five clips of Hamlet's 1.2 soliloquy.
Take careful notes on the acting and directorial choices made in each soliloquy.

Then address the prompt in the comment box below:

Make an argument: which performance of the 1.2 soliloquy best conveys the richness found in the language of the soliloquy and in the context of the dramatic situation Shakespeare has created? Be insightful. Be specific. Be persuasive. Additional requirement: make sure that while supporting your position that you discuss all of the performances (by comparing superior acting and directing choices to inferior ones--or ones that are, perhaps, successful and interesting but simply not as rich).

(Use your first name and last initial to identify your comment.)

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

What makes a personal essay successful?



What makes a personal essay successful?
  • Title
  • Voice and style (“a living voice” that uses “verbal nuance” and shows “self-awareness”)
  • Detail: emotional detail, physical description, literal and figurative imagery, dialogue, the exact name of people, places, things
  • Storytelling (compelling, suggestive events with “tension”)
  • Reflection (“constructing meaning” with “unreconciled tension,” “complexity” and “self-awareness”)
  • Organization
All elements contribute to the purpose, which in this case is to use the elements of personal essay writing to characterize a relationship that is important in your life.

Here are some prompts that will help you with the self-assessment and peer-assessment of your draft.
Title
Give a sense of the relationship between the title and the essay.

Explain how it is either explicit (stating something about the essay directly) or suggestive (implying a more symbolic and/or playful relationship with the essay).

Voice and style (“a living voice”)
Describe the voice and style of the essay.

Mark or write down places where the voice and style is particularly apparent and effective.

Explain how the voice and style suit the topic and themes.

Are there any dead metaphors or clichés? ("At the end of the day..." "When all is said and done...") Or phrases that might be clichés? Where? (Note: Playing with clichés, using them ironically, or bringing them back to life can be an effective technique, but this is hard to do.)

Are there any immature language patterns? (“In this essay I will…”) Where?

Does the essay show signs of “verbal nuance”? Where? What words seem very precise and suggestive? What words might be reconsidered and sharpened?

Describe the tone. How do you know? Does the tone suit the topic and themes?

Storytelling/anecdote/vignette
Where do you see evidence of storytelling? Where is the storytelling vivid? Where might it be more vivid? Where does it create tension or drama? Where might the tension or drama be heightened? Where is the storytelling suggesting something about the relationship? What is suggested?

Details: emotional detail, physical description (imagery), precise names for people and things, dialogue
Where do you see vivid, precise detail that suggests something about the relationship (or that characterizes the relationship)?

Where could the detail be sharper, more suggestive?

Has the writer helped the reader experience her/his world? Where?


Reflection: what does it all mean? why does it matter?
Where are the compelling insights into the relationship? Are they implied? Where? Are they stated? Where? What theme or themes seem to emerge from the essay?

Organization
Describe the organization and how it contributes to the essay’s effectiveness.
Is the organization straightforward? Inventive? Explain.
Is the opening effective in relation to the purpose?
Is the end effective in relation to the purpose?

**********************

A revised draft to be graded is due on Friday, October 12.
This draft should be as close to publishable quality as you can make it.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Brevity and the Personal Essay




Brevity publishes well-known and emerging writers working in the extremely brief (750 words or less [sic]) essay form. We have featured work from two Pulitzer prize finalists, numerous NEA fellows, Pushcart winners, Best American authors, and writers from India, Egypt, Ireland, Spain, Malaysia, and Japan. We have also published many previously unpublished authors, and take a special joy in helping to launch a new literary career.
**********************
That’s what the editors at Brevity: A Journal of Concise Literary Fiction have to say about their online literary journal.

Here’s your assignment: Write a concise personal essay (750 words or fewer) about a significant relationship in your life. It could be a relationship with a person, a group, a place, an object, or something else. In writing your essay consider the literary elements that we have investigated, particularly voice, organization, storytelling, description, and reflection. Use these elements to characterize the relationship and to develop a theme (or themes). (Use the class readings as models.) 

A first draft will be due on Wednesday, October 10. In class on October 10 you will self-assess and peer-assess drafts. A final draft will then be due on Friday, October 12.

***
Reminders:
Your assignment for Wednesday night is to write a paragraph reflecting on your six-word memoirs and your "bridges" in relation to Phillip Lopate's ideas about personal essay writing.
Bring the reflective paragraph to class Thursday 10/4 along with your six-word memoirs and bridges. 

Your assignment for Thursday night is to annotate two personal essays, "Stories from My Mother" and "Becoming a Sanvicentena: Five Stages". Bring the readings and annotations to class on Friday 10/5. 

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Fleshing out your personal narrative: Building bridges between your six six-word memoirs.

Tonight you're going to write sentences that link your six six-word memoir together in a coherent manner. Your goal is to make sense of the six-word memoirs as a whole. The linking sentences might be narrative (a sequence of events); they might be reflective and explanatory; they'll probably be a mixture of both. Make your writing vivid. Consider voice and tone. (Diction and syntax will affect voice and tone.) Consider creating suggestive characterizations, evocative images, and revealing comparisons (analogies, juxtapositions, allusions, metaphors, similes). Play around with the tools of memoirists and personal essay writers.

Bring a complete typed or handwritten draft to class tomorrow. This will be your ticket to participate in class.

Monday, October 1, 2012

Responding to Rhetoric: Your Choice

Tonight's assignment is to post a comment (300+ words) on the blog in which you informally but thoughtfully analyze the piece of rhetoric you chose to bring to class last week.
I'm particularly interested in you exploring and explaining how choices made by the creator(s) (the essayist, reporter, poet, writer, filmmaker, artist, musician) contribute to purpose.